tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post113893427815958899..comments2024-02-07T16:22:39.625-05:00Comments on Jeff Jedras: The more things change...Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1140470818301240492006-02-20T16:26:00.000-05:002006-02-20T16:26:00.000-05:00I dont think politicswatch was wrong. they report...I dont think politicswatch was wrong. they reported something and it changed after the initial report went up. They reported then on the updated report.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1139026177045502832006-02-03T23:09:00.000-05:002006-02-03T23:09:00.000-05:00Politics Watch was wrong.Politics Watch was wrong.Dan McKenziehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16070628161551970252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1138977088556811242006-02-03T09:31:00.000-05:002006-02-03T09:31:00.000-05:00I really doubt Martin is dreaming of a Trudeauian ...I really doubt Martin is dreaming of a Trudeauian rise from the ashes, but I do think his confidants may be having trouble letting go. As I said don't banish them, but they can't be seen to be holding onto the reigns of power.<BR/><BR/>On Christy Clark I've expounded on that topic at length elsewhere, but long story short I'd like her if it wasn't for the Mark Marrisen/Martinite baggage. I'd be happy to see her run but that baggage makes me leery of supporting her. <BR/><BR/>On Gomery I agree his conduct stinks but his report is seperate from the ongoing investigations by the RCMP and won't have any ill affect on any furture criminal or civil prosecutions. Except Chretien's lawsuit against him, of course.<BR/><BR/>On Copps' article, while I'm not a fan I largely agree with it. The exception though is near the top, when she talks about how she thinks gomery should have investigated polling. Polling had nothing to do with sponsorship. By polling she means Earnscliffe and Paul Martin, and it's just another potshot in her ongoing bitter dispute with PM. It spoils an otherwise fine article.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14971310821484459106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1138974277993200202006-02-03T08:44:00.000-05:002006-02-03T08:44:00.000-05:00anonymous - I could not agree with you more.You sh...anonymous - I could not agree with you more.<BR/><BR/>You should read:<BR/>Follow the Money, by: Sheila Copps <BR/>It is on www.nextface.blogspot.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1138973838383131072006-02-03T08:37:00.000-05:002006-02-03T08:37:00.000-05:00I can't believe these people. They de-throne Jean,...I can't believe these people. <BR/><BR/>They de-throne Jean, ruin Martin, and still think they can 'offer something' to the party. <BR/><BR/>We will sit in opposition a long long time before the idiots on the board find a way back into government.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1138947211343813772006-02-03T01:13:00.000-05:002006-02-03T01:13:00.000-05:00Carefully orchestrated plan to allow Chretien an...Carefully orchestrated plan to allow Chretien and gang to slither free. How? Gomery conduct, that's how.<BR/><BR/>Kinsella is all in a flap about Gomery giving an inside exclusive to writer Francois Perreault while all others were barred for *professional confidence* reasons.<BR/><BR/>Kinsella, today*s National Post P.A-14 or http://www.Warrenkinsella.com<BR/><BR/>This may be just enough misconduct by Gomery to let everyone go without charges while Justice Gomery could be subject to a few stern words and nothing more.<BR/><BR/>Is this Chretien*s and Martin*s escape hatch?<BR/><BR/>What a cheap plot. It is not an actual trial but rather an inquiry. For that reason there is no client lawyer confidentiality obligation on Gomery*s part, so Chretien can not claim betrayal by the court. <BR/>http://TonyGuitar.blogspot.comTonyGuitarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02776707579617985174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-1138947128768154442006-02-03T01:12:00.000-05:002006-02-03T01:12:00.000-05:00Always expect the unexpected in politics. When I h...Always expect the unexpected in politics. When I hear rumours through at least 3 different sources I know there's some truth to it.This is the 2nd time I've heard Christy Clarks name in terms of Leadership but I've also heard it for President of the LPC.Stranger things have happened.<BR/><BR/>Paul Martin was at his best in his press conference today, looking rested, happy and being himself. He was articulate, finally saying the things that I found so visionary about his leadership in 1990. It was lost on Canadians over the past 3 years. He will go on to do great things without the title of Office.<BR/><BR/>Bill Graham will be the Leader and elder statesman of the "L" shaped party.<BR/><BR/>Stay tuned....... as the story unfolds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com