tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post1332144706056424776..comments2024-02-07T16:22:39.625-05:00Comments on Jeff Jedras: High-flying hypocrisy: The Conservatives, Bombardier and corporate subsidiesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-55441898758452825502008-07-14T22:05:00.000-04:002008-07-14T22:05:00.000-04:00The auto industry, the air industry, the oil indus...The auto industry, the air industry, the oil industry. Is there any fat cat industry that the Conservatives (and Liberals) WON'T give hundreds of millions of dollars to?Saskboyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13258259356749068135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-44649391288309536082008-07-14T20:17:00.000-04:002008-07-14T20:17:00.000-04:00Amen, Red Tory. Saying like it is.Amen, Red Tory. Saying like it is.susansmithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02573558646874765432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-74233857378300033172008-07-14T19:14:00.000-04:002008-07-14T19:14:00.000-04:00This is a flip-flop long in the making. Remember t...This is a flip-flop long in the making. Remember that Harper sat on his hands and said nothing in 2005 when Paul Martin was doling out money to Bombardier. <BR/><BR/>When Harper realized that he needed to make electoral headway in Quebec his core neo-liberal ideology got thrown under the campaign bus. As always, votes are more important than principles. In this respect the Liberals and Conservatives turn out to be not much different from one another.Red Toryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00422305796158017027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-45586604958683936092008-07-14T19:12:00.001-04:002008-07-14T19:12:00.001-04:00To abc"Or are your Conservatives only in favour of...To abc<BR/><BR/>"Or are your Conservatives only in favour of jobs created under Conservative governments? Keep spinning, badly."<BR/><BR/>I'm in favor in job creation no matter who does it. Just to give you a little of my voting history. I know it has nothing to do with this post.<BR/><BR/>Do you know that the only time that I have voted Conservative was when Mr.Harper took over the party. <BR/><BR/>I have never voted P.C.before I have always voted liberals up until the new Conservative party was born. This is just to give you a little of my voting history. I don't think that I will ever vote liberal again. Some day you to will see the light the way I did.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-11292046025245506092008-07-14T19:12:00.000-04:002008-07-14T19:12:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Red Toryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00422305796158017027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-51756595484587086452008-07-14T18:39:00.000-04:002008-07-14T18:39:00.000-04:00And apparently you have no reading comprehension t...And apparently you have no reading comprehension the right is where it's not, as in the post I said quite clearly <B>I have no problem with these programs</B>. It was <B>your party brethren</B> that were vehemently against them, that termed them pandering, corporate welfare. <BR/><BR/>You mention 3500 jobs created. That's true. But they were creating jobs too when your party was on the pulpit against them. So what's the difference between then and now that caused them to change their minds? <BR/><BR/>Or are your Conservatives only in favour of jobs created under Conservative governments? Keep spinning, badly.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14971310821484459106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-78259835303157598262008-07-14T18:10:00.000-04:002008-07-14T18:10:00.000-04:00To abc"So what you're saying right is the Conserva...To abc<BR/><BR/>"So what you're saying right is the Conservatives have no explanation for the change in policy? OK then, good to know."<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=21b10ac3-4ab5-4996-8abf-3d1502c0e1f7" REL="nofollow">Is 3500 new direct jobs a good enough explanation I guess not.</A> Not to mention the indirect economic fall out that usually occurs with a project this big. Again don't you think this is not a good enough project hummm?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-63478024813663232892008-07-14T17:30:00.000-04:002008-07-14T17:30:00.000-04:00So what you're saying right is the Conservatives h...So what you're saying right is the Conservatives have no explanation for the change in policy? OK then, good to know.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14971310821484459106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-27003944986283246242008-07-14T17:22:00.000-04:002008-07-14T17:22:00.000-04:00the right where it's at....ah, in an interview rec...the right where it's at....ah, in an interview recently on Mike Duffy Live - Duffy asked Dion about his statement that he doesn't favour carbon tax - but, guess what - Dion admitted that and said he has changed his mind because he's found a way that they can balance the costs....that's called principled and admitting the truth - HUGE difference.<BR/><BR/>So, that argument is tired and, I see that the CPC supporters are trolling all over the blogosphere attacking Dion no matter what the subject is - tiresome and boring.<BR/><BR/>Have you people got ADD? This is about Harper and what he said/promised and his flip-flop not Dion's.RuralSandihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09552973218865121867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-55516251110854269132008-07-14T17:01:00.000-04:002008-07-14T17:01:00.000-04:00"Oh, and Dion as offered his explanation for the e..."Oh, and Dion as offered his explanation for the evolution of his position on a carbon shift; the public will pass their judgement. What's Harper's explanation? Needing to pander to Quebec?"<BR/><BR/>You know I just wish you liberals would just get off the "pander to Quebec" story it really is getting old. It's no wonder why the liberals are struggling here in Quebec. Pandering to Quebec,Alberta etc..What should we say against the Liberals that they are pondering to Torontonians hey? <BR/><BR/>What explanation to you want? No matter what the Conservatives say in you're mind they are pondering to Quebec and nothing will change that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-72849327766613156952008-07-14T16:38:00.000-04:002008-07-14T16:38:00.000-04:00You are allowed to go back. You are going back. Yo...You are allowed to go back. You are going back. You have been going back. And the ads you'll be running in the campaign, if not sooner, will be going back.<BR/><BR/>My point is are the Conservatives the only party that is allowed to point-out changes of mind hummm?<BR/><BR/>Oh, and Dion as offered his explanation for the evolution of his position on a carbon shift; the public will pass their judgement. What's Harper's explanation? Needing to pander to Quebec?Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14971310821484459106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-19492006520865323572008-07-14T16:26:00.000-04:002008-07-14T16:26:00.000-04:00Should we go back about just over 1 year when Mr.D...Should we go back about just over 1 year when Mr.Dion said that he doesn't favor a carbon tax? Not only he favors it but it will be his main campaign issue. Should I go back when the P.C's were in power,and the official opposition the Liberals were against let us see free trade and the gst remember it?<BR/><BR/>My point is are the Liberal's the only party that is allowed to change their minds hummm?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com