tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post838265764794358813..comments2024-02-07T16:22:39.625-05:00Comments on Jeff Jedras: Reports that reports of Lisa Raitt's death was premature may be prematureUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-43972443690223153442009-06-03T16:32:21.969-04:002009-06-03T16:32:21.969-04:00Whooee! Well, PeterFeller, if King Steve sez it...Whooee! Well, PeterFeller, if King Steve sez it's proper and acceptable, then it's proper and acceptable. If he decides tomorrow that it ain't proper and acceptable, then it ain't proper and acceptable.<br /><br />If a minister is responsible for secret documents when their name is Bernier, that don't mean a minister is responsible for secret papers if their name is Raitt.<br /><br />If a reactor is unsafe and is taken offline by a Liberal appointee, it's not really unsafe and cancer patients come before public safety so the reactor goes back online and the watchdog gets fired. If a reactor is taken offline for 3 months plus by a Conservative appointee, safety is public paramount and patients will have to wait until it's fixed. <br /><br />Accountability, consistency, fairness in the application of rules are all at the whim of King Steve. Remember his quote: "There will be no nuclear accidents." That bigass leak at Chalk River mustn't have been an accident, I reckon. <br /><br />JBJimBobbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04603665575714484326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-70648630032188708402009-06-03T16:11:46.262-04:002009-06-03T16:11:46.262-04:00good post and thanks for posting this. best summar...good post and thanks for posting this. best summary of this issue i have found<br /><br />linked from macleans.ca blogsdijehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06628974046058700678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-89187746230355860252009-06-03T15:01:06.816-04:002009-06-03T15:01:06.816-04:00Last night, at about 6:15 p.m., I made my first vi...Last night, at about 6:15 p.m., I made my first visit inside the Parliament Buildings. Waiting for the 2 fine fellows (MPs) who were taking me up for dinner in the Parliamentary Cafeteria, I saw the aforementioned KORY TENEYCKE.<br /><br />A fiftiesh man was coming through the doors and KORY told security that the man was going up to the Prime Minister's Office. He seemed to want to wisk the guy straight up the elevator, but security sent the fiftiesh man over to go through the metal detector.<br /><br />Of course KORY had him "bud in" in front of a group of school children. But what he did next really shocked me. He took the fiftiesh guy's bag (about laptop size) and put it over his shoulder so it would not have to go through the metal detector. When I went through security, they had me turn on both my laptop and cell phone to make sure they were working. Security was busy and missed the exchange.<br /><br />I stopped security and mentioned it to them. KORY and the fiftiesh aged man were out of sight, but the security guy did bring them back and had the bag go through the metal detector. But unlike me, the fiftiesh man never had to show his ID or to get an ID badge.<br /><br />Can someone tell me if this proper and if this is acceptable?MississaugaPeterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11399677268317787642noreply@blogger.com