tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post5502331133784385843..comments2024-02-07T16:22:39.625-05:00Comments on Jeff Jedras: Back to blogging and catching upUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-65418901254660524862009-10-26T11:19:42.132-04:002009-10-26T11:19:42.132-04:00John Pertwee,
Jeff Jedras has a great site and ha...John Pertwee,<br /><br />Jeff Jedras has a great site and has written wonderful posts in support of the Liberal Party.<br /><br />His insight is now shared on the Nationalpost.<br /><br />John Pertwee why do you think it is appropriate to call for censorship on every blog you find a dissenting poster?<br /><br />John on your blog install your "greasemonkey plugin" can I suggest you visit the a communist, third world country regarding those filters.<br /><br />Thankfully John your repeated calls for censorship are ignored by bloggers of substance.<br /><br />Cheers.CanadianSensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01010880162544507668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-38528160303658993192009-10-26T11:02:12.596-04:002009-10-26T11:02:12.596-04:00Does anyone have a greasemonkey plugin I can use t...Does anyone have a greasemonkey plugin I can use to block out Canadiansense? I am really bored to death with his obsessions. Now he seems to think inquisiting other bloggers over his own interpretations is interesting. Someone needs to get a better hobby.Jon Pertweehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15885012077740645175noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-17952535858873607172009-10-25T23:27:01.666-04:002009-10-25T23:27:01.666-04:00Welcome back on Feb 27, 2008 you wrote a scathing ...Welcome back on Feb 27, 2008 you wrote a scathing post.<br />In those twenty months since than how has the party changed?CanadianSensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01010880162544507668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-45967972136846263692009-10-24T18:24:29.925-04:002009-10-24T18:24:29.925-04:00Remind me of when the NDP ever "demonized&quo...Remind me of when the NDP ever "demonized" the Green Shift? I know the Tories did that quite a bit, but I followed the last election campaign pretty closely and as I recall, Layton never much about the Liberals or Dion or the Green Shift at all - other than to say that the NDP had a plan on the environment which he felt was superior (what else do you expect him to say?).<br /><br />Meanwhile the environmental groups are up in arms over the Liberals about face on this bill. Iggy's gonna have a LOT of explaining to do.DLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11587165866597795302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-833061753071720692009-10-24T17:50:50.435-04:002009-10-24T17:50:50.435-04:00Really Devin, I still don't see why gunning th...Really Devin, I still don't see why gunning this thing through is necessary, and I find it impossible to take the NDP seriously on the environment, not after they demonized Dion's carbon shift for nothing but pure partisan advantage. The NDP wants to gun this thing through so they can make people think they care about the environment. I'm just not buying it.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14971310821484459106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-82440121984802172832009-10-24T16:22:29.570-04:002009-10-24T16:22:29.570-04:00The thing is, you've had three years to consid...The thing is, you've had three years to consider the damn bill. It's time to either put up or shut up. C-311 does not prescribe a particular regulatory scheme - it would be up to the government to decided whether they want cap and trade, a carbon tax, or whatever other regulatory regime they want. All the bill does is establish hard, science-based targets and holds the government accountable to meet those targets.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-43068568283893770072009-10-24T11:44:10.109-04:002009-10-24T11:44:10.109-04:00Welcome back Jeff. :)
I gotta say that some of th...Welcome back Jeff. :)<br /><br />I gotta say that some of the liberals going over the top on the cheque issue (and others). Sorta makes them look like Layton or May. And that is not the impression you want to give people. Oppose, but do it with some class and some intelligence.<br /><br />"Liberals talk policy" If you say so. They made a small commitment to a couple of things... without really talking about what they would do to further those things. And with childcare again.... "if we feel we have the money to do it"... uh huh, nice commitment to the principle and the policy. It is a good push on the idea that liberals can be fiscally responsible, but what people took away is "another decade of promises to make a childcare program that will never happen"Barcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00797062032956713967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-24626370279943963922009-10-24T11:27:01.607-04:002009-10-24T11:27:01.607-04:00"Whenever the bill is passed the Conservative..."Whenever the bill is passed the Conservatives will ignore it, the world won’t notice or care, and it will have no impact on the government’s climate change policy whatsoever."<br /><br />If true, the Liberals should have passed it. <br /><br />But it does have impact. I looked, I saw, and now the Liberals are disliked even further by me.<br /><br />They had a chance to make a symbolic gesture towards the key issue of our times, and look what they did.Mark Richard Francishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16331995640397477486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-62726355249069662142009-10-23T13:41:09.316-04:002009-10-23T13:41:09.316-04:00NDP, SchmeNDP, our behaviour is strange - somethin...NDP, SchmeNDP, our behaviour is strange - something is going on inside caucus. Read my post, "Famous Fourteen", and if you have time, read through the minutes and testimony at committee, and reflect on the LeBlanc vote vs. McGuinty & Trudeau...something's going on. The current iteration of the OLO has only made a loose & weak semi-commitment to a possible involvement in continental cap & trade system, and nothing more on carbon pricing. If the membership indeed favours, as successive resolutions at conventions indicate, real, effective climate change policy, of which real carbon pricing is an essential element, then we should do what we can to support those members of caucus, like the Famous Fourteen, who are trying to work to make that our policy, and others, who may seem to be toeing the current ambiguous party line but whom, knowing their history and reading the tea leaves, I'm pretty sure are doing the same behind closed doors. Something's going on in caucus, and if you want to be consistent with yourself, on respecting the membership & on the policy question itself, you should speak up and help the 14 & their allies.<br /><br />http://eugeneforseyliberal.blogspot.com/2009/10/famous-fourteen.htmlEugene Forsey Liberalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05538109652483033119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19402125.post-39084273441900710132009-10-23T13:20:06.479-04:002009-10-23T13:20:06.479-04:00Welcome back Jeff and a great post.
I am flabberga...Welcome back Jeff and a great post.<br />I am flabbergasted with the Reform/Cons supporters. They come back with blaming the other parties for their dictator leader and his parrot caucuses gaffs and making excuses for him at every turn like using the excuse but...but, the Liberals were doing the same all the time. They are stuck A** deep in the 90's where most of them were probably in playschool and right now are still in grade school. They have been so thoroughly brainwashed they couldn't find their way out of a paper bag.mariehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07878825121729826425noreply@blogger.com