Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Are you sure you really want to be a Conservative, Brian?

This story is a day too early for an April Fool's prank so it must be true. The Conservative Party and Brian Mulroney are feuding over his membership status. The party says he ain't a member, but Brian insists 'till death do us part!

Simmering tensions between Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government and predecessor Brian Mulroney boiled over with party sources saying he was no longer a Conservative and the ex-leader insisting he will be a party member as long as he draws breath.

Senior Conservatives contacted select reporters Tuesday to tell them Mulroney had effectively torn up his party card.

"I can confirm he is no longer a member," said one Conservative source.

The source said Mulroney called a senior party official two months ago to ask that his name be pulled off all party lists and materials and that communications with him cease.

"It was a call made at a senior level," said the source. "As is the case with anyone, we complied and did so."

Mulroney briskly fired off an unequivocal statement through his public relations team.

"I remain a member of the Conservative Party and I will remain so until the day I die," Mulroney said.


Well, I admire Brian's loyalty, if not much else. He should check his calendar though: this is the week the Conservative Party of Canada and the former Progressive Conservatives are totally different. Sorry Hugh Segal, Marjory Lebreton et al. But don't worry. I think next week it'll be back to a long, proud history of conservatism in Canada.

It's interesting though. Harper has for awhile been doing a reasonably effective job of rebuilding the old PC coalition that Mulroney road to successive majority governments: Quebec nationalists, the West, and progressive conservatives/red tories. Well, Harper had made progress on the first two anyway. And he was trying to replace the red tories by winning over conservative-sympathetic ethnic voters, and making progress too. But now he's losing Quebec, and this ongoing tiff with Mulroney, where I'm told they're rather fond of him, won't help.

Obviously at this point Harper has abandoned the Mulroney coalition model. One that, well, worked pretty well. For a time, anyways. Which begs the question: what's Harper's new gameplan? Or is the strategic master just making it up as he goes along?

You know who Harper should call advice?

Brian ... oh, yeah, right. Never mind.

Recommend this Post on Progressive Bloggers

4 comments:

Mike said...

I think Harper's career will go just like Mulroney's:
1) Two election victories
2) Decline in the polls
3) Resignation due to fear of facing the voters again

I don't think Harper will be leader by the time of the next election - if Harper doesn't see the writing on the wall, his party will with each passing month and I think we all know Harper would rather run away from the electorate than risk facing defeat (just like he did in the House of Commons with prorogation).

He may try another hail mary or two, but I can't see how it would work, it's all downhill from here.

On the plus side for him I guess he could finally finish that hockey book....

RuralSandi said...

I think Harper's book is a strategy/image thing just like Bush's ranch.

Problem is - Mulroney is a Conservative and has been all his adult life.

Harper is not. He's gone from Liberal to Conservative to Reform to Alliance to a merger as an excuse to call his party Conservative because they'd never get elected any other way.

Harper should have his membership taken away and an honourary one given to Mulroney for his years of service to the party and having to majority mandates.

ktr said...

Harper always asks Michelle Mundean for advice. A stylist and psychic all in one she is. What a great way to spend taxpayer dollars efficiently than by paying for 2 services that aren't needed, with just one big and easy salary.

On a more serious note, as the government cuts back, will Harper quit using taxpayer dollars to pay for a stylist? A good question that needs to be asked says I.

Jason Hickman said...

Of course, if Mulroney wants to talk with someone who *realy* knows what it's like to be kicked to the curb, to have your legacy buried as fast as the dirt can be shovelled on top of it by the new guy, and to have your strengths, whatever they may be, ignored if not mocked alltogether ....

... well, he knows who to call.