While I didn’t support the creation of the Liberal “supporter”category that allows anyone that’s not a member of another party to vote for
the party’s next leader without buying a membership, now that we have the
system I do want it to be a success. And the integrity of the supporter system
is going to be an important part of the next leadership race.
In a recent message to Liberals, the party touted the
sign-up of over 10,000 supporters in the first month the system was up and
running. It’s an impressive number, and I know many ridings are making signing
up supporters a real priority, going door to door in their communities in
examples of the kind of grass-roots activism and campaigning that will get the
Liberal Party back on track.
I am concerned, though, about how real that 10,000 number
is. That’s because another way many people are being signed-up are through the
widely-circulated, issue-based petition drives coming out of the Liberal office
in Ottawa. The petitions are mainly a data gathering exercise; the party wants
to find out what issues you care about, and then send you targeted messaging
(and fundraising pitches) in the future. It all makes good sense and is part of
modern campaigning.
The problem, though, is evident in this petition drive on the closure of Coast Guard stations. As you can see, when you land on the
petition page the box to automatically become a registered Liberal supporter
with the signing of the petition is pre-clicked.
This raises several obvious concerns. For one, how many
people don’t notice that box and just click submit, just wanting to express
their opinion on the petition issue? Also, there’s no information or link to
just what a supporter is or what that entails. There’s nothing, for example,
about the commitment to “shared Liberal ideals” we heard about when creating
the supporter category; also missing is the requirement to affirm you’re not a
member of any other political party.
I’ve already been hearing anecdotal reports of riding
associations getting lists of new supporters from Ottawa and phoning them to
follow-up (outreach that’s great to see), only to have many of them surprised
to find themselves on a supporters list. They’d just wanted to sign a petition.
I want to see us get this supporters thing right, and we
need to avoid alienating potential supporters by not getting their informed
consent. We want people to make the concious decision to become supporters, and we need to give that meaning. I hope we’ll re-visit pre-checking that box, and add more language or
a link to more information on what being a supporter actually means.
Big numbers make nice headlines, but informed and committed
supporters are what will make a difference.
Recommend this Post on Progressive Bloggers
3 comments:
I thought the supporter thing made sense first but if the party is't willing to put in the effort to get it right then it's pointless.
What's the sense of saying you signed up 50,000 supporters if only 15,000 of them vote in the leadership election? The idea was suppose to be to get people engaged with the Liberals without them having to pay to be an official member. Not for the executive to say we have X number of supporters.
I still believe the party should have had two votes for its leader whereby the first vote would allow all supporters and members to vote and the second and final vote would only allow members to vote for the leader, if nobody won 50% on the first ballot.
If you had "supporters" last time 'round I guarantee you would have Hedy Fry as leader. Thousands of CPC members would have mad it so.
Agreed. I hate when political parties try to trick in a sense, and a pre checked box to become a supporter undermines the integrity of the process. Let's earn support, not pad numbers using annoying tactics.
Post a Comment