From February
20-23, federal Liberals will gather in Montreal, and one of their tasks will be
to elect a new national executive. Last week, I published interviews with some
of the table officer candidates. This week, I
finish with the candidates for party president.
Two contested elections will be held for national board
positions at the Montreal biennial – national membership secretary, and party
president. The two candidates seeking the office of president – Brian Rice from
Vancouver and Anna Gainey from Montreal -- both offer impressive ideas and
distinct visions of how they see the role, and what they’d like to do in the
position.
I recently spoke with Anna Gainey about her campaign, the
challenges facing the party and the role she sees the president playing in
meeting those challenges. The following is an edited transcript of our
conversation. My interview with Brian Rice ran yesterday.
How do you define the
role of national president?
First and foremost, the role pf the party president is to
represent the membership at senior levels of the party. For the next two years
we’ll be focused on election readiness going into a campaign, so a lot of the
interactions at the senior levels of the party will be with the national
election readiness committee and the party to make sure we’re prepared.
Why would you like to
be national president?
I’ve been involved with party for a long time. Most recently
I was involved with Justin’s (Trudeau) leadership team. When I understood that
Mike (Crawley) wasn’t going to be running again it gave me a moment to consider
if that would be a good time to expand my commitment and involvement, and after
some reflection over the summer I decided it would be. We had a lot of momentum
and a great organization built around Justin’s leadership campaign and I had
the opportunity to build on that momentum and bring those people into this
organization and build towards winning in 2015.
What’s your first
priority should you get the job?
My platform has some overarching themes, and four broader
categories of where I see our priorities. I put forward some specific ideas
under those. But they’re just that – suggestions. It will be up to a broad
group to look at that, to do some feasibility studies and decide how we
prioritize and move forward as a team. I don’t see the president as someone
there to drive personal priorities. I want this to be a collaborative effort. I
want to put forward some ideas on what I believe people see, but we will need
to come together to see what resources we have. It needs to be a product of
collaboration with the team.
How do you propose to
put the ridings at more of the centre of the party?
I think one of the biggest challenges I hear from people,
and I’ve experienced this myself as a riding president, is we could do a better
job communicating and coordinating through all levels of the party. We could
improve our cohesiveness. Sometimes there’s just a lack of clarity. When you
become a riding president, where do you go to learn what that job means?
We need to clarify the lines of communication to make sure
information is available to volunteers, and they know where to get it. If we
can be better coordinated and improve our communications, that’s going to help
our volunteers do better, and find a niche where they can contribute and get
the training and resources to do that role, whether its canvassing of setting up
an EDA (electoral district association).
It will be different from riding to riding, depending on the
health of the riding, whether it’s urban or suburban. Every riding has its own
needs, and it’s up to the party to listen to what those needs are and ensure
the people on the ground prepared to do the work have access to the tools they
need.
(My blogging colleague Scott Tribe recently wrote about the frequency of party fundraising emails and hadn’t received a reply from the Gainey
campaign by his deadline, so I asked the following question.)
How can the party
better coordinate fundraising efforts so members and supporters receive less
pitch e-mails, and nomination candidates, riding associations and PTAs as well
as the national level all have room to raise for their respective needs?
To me it goes back to preparation and election readiness,
and the room for improvement communicating through different levels of the
party. As a riding president, I’ve had the experience of planning an event only
to have it bumped by something at another level of the party. I can also relate
to the frustration of repeated asks.
I think there’s technology and analytics we can use so we
can be targeted with our asks and be more surgical, and we’re not hitting the
same people over and over again with the same message. That’s something we need
to improve on.
When it comes to different levels of the party not making it
difficult to raise the money needed for the campaign, that’s going to come through
awareness of what’s going on on the ground and the national party trying to be
sensitive to the efforts of volunteers working to support their local
candidates. That’s an area where the national president can be helpful. I intend to be accessible to help through those situations
as they arise.
It won’t be perfect all the time, but I think if we have people committed to solving problems through dialogue and communication it will go a long way to smoothing out potential hiccups.
It won’t be perfect all the time, but I think if we have people committed to solving problems through dialogue and communication it will go a long way to smoothing out potential hiccups.
- Liberal Party of Canada presidential candidate interview: Brian Rice
- LPC national board candidate interview: Maryanne Kampouris for national policy chair
- LPC national board candidate interview: Arif Khan for national membership secretary
- LPC national board candidate interview: Leanne Bourassa for national membership secretary
- LPC national board candidate interview: Chris MacInnes for vice-president, English
- Exit Interview: Liberal Party of Canada national membership secretary Matthew Certosimo
- Exit interview: Liberal Party of Canada president Mike Crawley
No comments:
Post a Comment